Warming Fact or Fiction

What would it take to replace coal in the U.S?

Clipart by Clker.com
Which way will the scale tip for climate control, or cap and tax for profit.

For the people or against the people.
__________________________________________________________

Green Hell Blog

November 3, 2009

From today’s Financial Times, here’s what it would take to replace coal as a fuel for generating electricity:

It would take a massive effort to replace coal production. Peabody Energy, which owns North Antelope and is the world’s largest private sector coal company, says replacing coal would be a gargantuan task. It would require 2,400 times more solar generation, 40 times more wind power, 250 new nuclear plants, almost double the US production of natural gas, 500 hydro plants the size of the Hoover Dam or halving electricity consumption. Even then, the US would have to find a way to meet new demand, given growth forecasts.

The greens’ choice, of course, is the “halving electricity consumption” option. But never in the history of mankind has reduced energy use been associated with social and economic advancement.

© 2009, Warming Fact or Fiction. All rights reserved.

NY Times excuses Gore’s climate profiteering

Clipart courtesy clker.com

Cleaning up Methane gas only for a profit.

A little reminiscing about how tax and cap will effect you if passed, see how they lie to make a profit while you try to scrape up enough money to pay all the taxes you will be paying, could this be why every one in Government wants to pass it as fast as they can before they get voted out of office.

There are several articles that will show you how corrupt cap & tax is and has really nothing to do with global warming or climate change, it is only to make the rich richer.

_________________________________________________________

Green Hell Blog

November 3, 2009

© 2009, Warming Fact or Fiction. All rights reserved.